5 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
3 people	fc4a615700	MUL-7726: let the workspace choose the status merged PRs move an issue to (#8862) ... * feat(pr): move issues to a workspace-chosen status when their PRs merge (MUL-7726) The merge automation completed an issue only when a PR said "Closes MUL-1", so the workspace switch mostly did nothing: most PRs are linked by title or branch and never completed anything. The workspace now picks what a merge does, in settings.pr_merge_status: "none", or the key of a started or done status (custom ones included, Blocked excluded). Absent means Done. When every linked PR is merged, the issue moves to that status. A closing keyword only links. - Decision: terminal, triage, "none", the per-issue switch and a new at_target state (the issue already has the target) come before the PR states, so the issue page only speaks when a merge would move the issue. The response adds target_status. - MoveIssueFromPullRequests replaces CompleteIssueFromPullRequests and writes the target status. The target is resolved through the delivery's shared catalog read (Resolver.WritableCategory). An archived or unknown choice, or a failed read, fails closed to no write. - Close intent is no longer synced or read. The column stays. - Migration 551 pins "none" on existing workspaces whose history shows a merge never moved every issue: auto-complete switched off, or a linked PR whose merges were not all keyword merges. Workspaces with no links, or with only keyword merges, keep the Done default. Replays are harmless. - CLI: `multica issue pr-automation <id> on|off` lets an agent keep one issue where it is. The multica-platform skill describes the new rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * feat(views): choose the status merged PRs move an issue to on the GitHub page (MUL-7726) - Settings → Integrations → GitHub → Features: "After PRs merge, move the issue to" picks Don't change, or a started or done status, custom ones included and Blocked excluded. It replaces the read-only auto-complete row. The self-hosted Git page shows the same setting. The statuses page drops its switch, and a badge on the target status now links to the setting. - Issue sidebar: the line under the PR list names the target status ("Moves to In Review when #19 merges"). It says nothing when the workspace leaves status alone, when the issue already has the target, or on an older backend's no_close_intent. The per-issue switch reads "Keep status when PRs merge" and is hidden when it would change nothing. The menu opens the GitHub setting. The link hint only shows while auto-link is on. - core: derivePRMergeStatus replaces derivePRAutoCompleteEnabled; the auto_complete schema adds target_status and the at_target state. - Copy in 5 languages. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * docs: describe the workspace-chosen status for merged PRs (MUL-7726) GitHub integration, self-hosted Git, issues and environment variable pages (4-5 languages) now say that the workspace picks what a merge does: Done by default, another started or done status, or no change. They also say that a closing keyword only links, and how to keep one issue's status. The troubleshooting entries explain what a missing line under the PR list means. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * refactor(pr): keep the merge automation out of agents' instructions (MUL-7726) Agents don't act on what a merge does to an issue, so they don't need a command for it or a rule to learn. Drop `multica issue pr-automation`, and cut the multica-platform skill down to how PRs get linked: no merge rule, no auto_complete field guide, no "the server moves it to done" note. People still keep one issue's status from its Pull requests menu, and the docs now point there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(pr): keep the retired auto-complete switch working for old desktop clients (MUL-7726) Review of #8862: an admin on a desktop client from before this change can still flip "Complete issues when their PRs merge". The client saved pr_auto_complete_enabled = false, and the save looked successful, but the server only read pr_merge_status, so merges kept moving issues to Done. - Settings writes: a flip of the retired switch becomes a choice (off → none, on → Done). An old client that echoes a chosen target without flipping the switch leaves the target alone. Every write mirrors the switch from the effective choice (false for none, absent otherwise), so old clients show the right state. - Reads: without pr_merge_status, the retired switch decides (off → none, else Done), on the server and in derivePRMergeStatus. This also covers settings written by a pod that predates the change during rollout. - Migration 551 sets the switch off on the workspaces it pins to none. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]>	2026-09-27 02:26:24 +08:00
Bohan Jiangandmultica-agent	0da0b46bbf	MUL-7672: only a closing keyword completes an issue on PR merge (#8794) ... * feat(pr): only a closing keyword completes an issue on merge (MUL-7672) #8758 made every linked PR count toward auto-complete, so a title-only "MUL-123: ..." PR moved its issue to Done on merge. Restore the earlier contract: a PR completes its issue only when its title or body puts a closing keyword (Closes/Fixes/Resolves) right before the identifier. - Body closing keywords link again; a bare body mention still links nothing. - close_intent is recorded on the link and follows the PR text until the merge/close event, then freezes; a link first made after merge carries none. - The decision requires every linked PR merged and at least one with close intent; a new no_close_intent state explains why a merge won't complete. - Everything else from #8758 stays: manual link/remove, per-issue and workspace switches, edge-triggered evaluation, the result line. - Docs (4 languages), UI copy (5 languages) and the multica-platform skill describe the keyword rule again. Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(pr): sync close intent on every link of the PR (MUL-7672) Review of #8794 found two ways a withdrawn closing keyword still completed the issue: - close_intent was refreshed only for identifiers the PR still claimed, so a manual link, or an automatic link whose merge event (carrying the final text) arrived before the edit event, kept a stale true. - the refresh sat behind the auto-link toggle, so turning auto-link off froze whatever intent was recorded. Replace the per-link update with one PR-wide sync: until the merge/close event, every link of the PR (automatic or manual) gets close_intent exactly when the current title/body closes its issue. It runs whenever GitHub features are on, independent of auto-link, which now only decides which links are created. Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(pr): decide close intent apart from auto-link ownership (MUL-7672) Re-review of #8794: the PR-wide close intent sync reused the auto-link verdict, and resolvePRLinkPolicy skips workspaces with auto-link off. With an installation bound to several workspaces, turning auto-link off in one of them therefore cleared a closing keyword only that workspace resolves, and the merge no longer completed the issue. The policy now reads every bound workspace with GitHub on, and records the identifier's sole resolver next to the auto-linking owner. Links still follow the owner (auto-link off workspaces are not competing claimants); close intent is permitted for the owner or the sole resolver, so an identifier that resolves in more than one workspace stays withheld. Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]>	2026-09-24 14:56:59 +08:00
3 people	9df0cae78a	MUL-7429: complete issues when every linked PR merges (#8758) ... * feat(pr): complete issues when every linked PR merges (MUL-7429) Title/branch identifiers link a PR; keywords and the body no longer matter. Completion is evaluated only on a PR event for the issue (merge, link, unlink), so settings changes and reopening never complete an issue. Adds manual link/unlink with remembered exclusions and a per-issue auto-complete switch. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * feat(pr): issue-page PR automation and single auto-complete setting (MUL-7429) The issue's Pull requests section says what the merge rule will do next, links a PR by URL, removes one per row, and turns auto-complete off for that issue. The workspace switch lives under Issue statuses; the GitHub page reports it. Agent skill and docs describe the title/branch rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(pr): accept PR links pasted without a scheme (MUL-7429) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * test(skills): pin the PR auto-complete contract in the platform skill (MUL-7429) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(pr): re-check linked PRs at the completion write; skip stale GitHub events (MUL-7429) The status write now requires every linked PR to still be merged when it runs, so a PR linked between the decision and the write keeps the issue open. GitHub PR upserts ignore events older than the stored row, like the self-hosted path, so a late delivery cannot roll a merged PR back to open and turn a redelivered merge into a new one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]>	2026-09-24 02:58:19 +08:00
Bohan Jiang	116761e505	MUL-7072 fix(github): retire reference-only PR links (#8245) ... A bare body mention of an issue key claimed nothing, yet auto-link wrote a link row for it and flagged it reference_only — filtered out of the PR list, the close aggregate and the review dedup head SHA. The row had no reader, and once the PR went terminal the preserve gate froze the flag, so adding `Closes MUL-1` to a merged PR's body could never surface the PR on its issue. With no unlink surface anywhere, the one repair available from GitHub was the one that could not work. Write no row for a passing mention, delete the historical hidden rows (migration 458), and drop the column's reads and writes; the column itself goes in a follow-up release that re-runs the delete as a mop-up. The visible set of links is unchanged, except that a post-merge `Closes` now links the PR (without retroactively completing the issue). An open PR whose claim is downgraded in place loses its link, which is what hiding used to accomplish. Docs, the four locales, and the agent-facing platform skill are updated in step.	2026-09-10 17:16:50 +08:00
dixonl90andBohan	581d9527ba	feat(vcs): self-hosted Git providers (Forgejo, Gitea, GitLab) alongside GitHub (MUL-3772) (#5006) ... Adds self-hosted Git provider support (Forgejo, Gitea, GitLab) alongside GitHub: per-workspace token connection, a provider-dispatched webhook, PR/MR and CI mirroring, and the shared issue auto-link / auto-close machinery. Off until MULTICA_VCS_SECRET_KEY is set, so existing deployments are unaffected. Co-authored-by: Bohan <[email protected]>	2026-07-24 15:01:27 +08:00