mirror of
https://gh-proxy.org/https://github.com/klinsmaya/multica.git
synced 2026-11-10 02:16:45 +08:00
* feat(auth): slide UI session expiry instead of fixing it at login A session token's exp was stamped once at login and never moved, so every continuously active user was logged out 30 days later, always mid-task. The session now re-issues itself once it drops below half its TTL, turning that scheduled logout into an idle bound. Renewal is stateless: it copies the claims of a token we signed and moves exp, so there is no session table and no DB read on the hot path. - Browsers are renewed inline by middleware.Auth on safe requests, keeping the session HttpOnly — no client change and no multi-tab coordination. - Clients holding the session as a string (Desktop, mobile) get POST /api/auth/refresh, which only ever accepts a UI JWT. PATs, agent task tokens and cloud-node PATs are refused: a machine credential must not become an interactive session. An expired JWT cannot be revived. - CSRF tokens are now bound to a new sid claim, stable across renewals, so re-issuing the auth cookie no longer invalidates a CSRF token another tab already read. The pre-existing binding stays valid so sessions that predate this keep working until they renew. - CloudFront cookies are re-signed alongside a renewal, so the CDN policy cannot outlive its session. The idle bound is one-sided and the comments say so: a session last used while it still had over half its TTL left is not extended, so the guaranteed survivable gap is TTL/2, not TTL. Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * feat(auth): renew the session on Desktop, mobile, and legacy token-mode web Completes the client half of sliding sessions. Browsers on cookie auth need nothing — the server re-issues their cookie inline — so this covers the clients that carry the session as a string and have to persist a new one. Renewal follows use, not a clock. Checks run at launch, on returning to the foreground, and on interaction; there is deliberately no interval timer, because a timer would keep an abandoned but still-open window (or a backgrounded phone) signed in forever. The server decides whether a session is renewable and tells the client when to ask again, derived from the deployment's configured TTL — so no client reads exp, hardcodes a cadence, or has to reason about clock skew. Renewal is not a session event, and each step protects that: - Concurrent triggers collapse into one request, so two valid tokens never race to be the one stored. On mobile the single-flight flag is set before the first await, since reading the Keychain is itself async. - A response that lands after logout or an account switch is discarded by comparing against the session the attempt started from; writing it back would resurrect a session the app has already torn down. - Offline, 5xx and an unreadable body all keep the current session, which is still valid for at least another half TTL. Only a real 401 ends a session, and that path is untouched — nothing here can clear tabs or drafts. - WebSocket clients now read the token at connect time instead of pinning the one captured when they were built, so a reconnect after a renewal authenticates with the current credential. Web also retries a rejected CSRF token once. Session-bound CSRF makes that unreachable in the steady state; it covers the single transition where a session predating that binding is renewed for the first time. Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(auth): address review blockers on sliding session renewal Six fixes from review, each with a regression test that fails without it. An expired session was answered 403, not 401. The CSRF gate runs before the JWT is validated, and it read `sid` through the expiry-enforcing parser — so an expired cookie lost its sid, its perfectly good CSRF token failed to verify, and the user's first action after expiry was a rejected write instead of a return to the login page. Reading the session id and deciding access are now different questions with different parsers: the first only needs the signature, the second still enforces expiry. Rolling back was not survivable. A previous release can verify only the token-bound CSRF binding, so once a session was issued or renewed by this one, a rollback left every signed-in user able to read and unable to write, with no client retry able to help. Both bindings are now issued: clients echo both, the server accepts either, and the token-bound cookie is re-minted on every renewal so a rollback taken at any moment still finds a usable pair. Mobile could resurrect a session it had just ended. Keychain deletes are async, so a renewal that sampled storage after logout began but before the delete landed would write its replacement back. A session epoch, incremented synchronously at the start of logout, a 401 teardown and a new sign-in, closes the window comparing tokens cannot — including the case where logout lands during the renewal's own write, which is now undone rather than left behind. Mobile only checked at launch and on foreground, so an app held in the foreground and used continuously would never check again and could expire under the user's hands. Every touch now passes through a capture-phase responder that declines the gesture it observes. CloudFront cookies were re-signed by a middleware not every renewing route mounts — the plugin bridge renews without it, and would have slid the session forward while leaving the CDN policy behind. Re-signing moved next to the renewal itself, so the two cannot diverge by route. The renewal check interval could exceed the window it has to land in: a flat five-minute floor meant any TTL under ten minutes produced a cadence longer than the renewal window, logging out clients that followed it exactly. The cadence is now capped at half the threshold, which outranks both clamps. Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(auth): close the CORS, credential-write and short-TTL gaps Three blockers from the second review round. The two CSRF values now travel in one header instead of two. A second header name would have to be in the server's CORS allowlist, and that list is version-specific: a browser holding a cookie this release issued, talking to a rolled-back server, would send a header that server never allowlisted. The preflight fails, the request never reaches a handler, and no retry helps — precisely the half-logged-in state the second cookie exists to prevent. With one header name the server just tries both bindings, and the client switches to the token-bound value when a server rejects the session-bound one. It switches back as soon as the cookie changes, keyed on the rejected value rather than a flag, so it cannot oscillate once per renewal. A test now pins the CSRF header to the allowlist so a future second header fails here rather than in production. Mobile credential writes are serialized, and a stale renewal is refused rather than undone. Compensating after the fact meant deleting whatever was stored — which, after a logout and a fresh sign-in, is the new account's token: the app would be logged in in memory and signed out on the next launch. The check and the write now happen inside one serialized unit, so a logout or a sign-in cannot land between them and a refusal writes nothing at all. AUTH_TOKEN_TTL has a documented one-minute minimum. Clients are told when to check again in whole seconds, so a shorter TTL asks the wire to carry a sub-second cadence: it truncates, and below about four seconds it serialises to 0. Values under the minimum are clamped up with a startup warning rather than honoured. Mobile's floors were never actually lowered in the previous commit — 1h/1m, not the 5s/5m claimed — so both clients now floor at 5s, below anything the server can send, and fall back to 30s, which fits the smallest supported window. The cadence tests assert the serialised integer a client actually receives, not the internal time.Duration. Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(auth): keep a failed renewal cheap and a renewed token shared Two blockers from the full-PR review, plus the documentation the config change owes. A failed check no longer consumes the normal cadence. The two were one number, so a single 503 spent whatever the server had last suggested — with the 30-day default that is three days. A client told to check again in three days on day 12, returning on day 29 with one day of session left and hitting one 503, would not have been allowed to retry until day 32: two days after the session it was trying to save had expired. Failures now buy a short backing-off delay of their own, reset by the next success, so recovery follows the network rather than the cadence. The bearer token is read from shared storage per request instead of cached per client. Desktop runs one ApiClient per window over one localStorage, so a session renewed in one window left the others sending a credential on its way out until it expired and took the whole session down. A 401 is also now matched against the credential that produced it: a request that went out just before a renewal can be answered after it, and treating that as expiry would tear down a session that is demonstrably alive, clearing tabs and drafts with it. Documentation catches up with both the behaviour and the new minimum, in all four languages: sessions are an idle bound rather than a countdown from sign-in, the bound is one-sided, and AUTH_TOKEN_TTL clamps up at 60s. The rationale for that minimum is corrected too — it is the 5s floor every client applies to the derived cadence, not whole-second serialisation, which only binds far below it. Also removes two claims that were not true: that a failed renewal leaves at least half a TTL (it happens inside the window, so less), and that an open untouched window never renews (cookie-mode sessions slide on any authenticated request, background polling included). Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> * fix(auth): back off on a renewal response that carries no cadence A 200 whose body fails schema validation does not throw — parseWithFallback returns zeroes — so both clients reset the failure count without moving the next-check deadline, and every subsequent interaction fired another request at a server already answering badly. A missing cadence is now treated as a failure and takes the same short backoff; a token that did arrive is still applied. Also settles the documentation wording: the 30 days is not an idle timer. Renewal only happens past the halfway point, so an unused session can end sooner than 30 days after its last use, and saying otherwise promised precision the design does not have. Refs MUL-7436 Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: J <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: multica-agent <[email protected]>
390 lines
14 KiB
Go
390 lines
14 KiB
Go
package auth
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"net/http"
|
|
"net/http/httptest"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestIsSecureCookie(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
frontendOrigin string
|
|
want bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{"https origin → Secure", "https://app.example.com", true},
|
|
{"https with port", "https://app.example.com:8443", true},
|
|
{"http origin → not Secure", "http://192.168.5.5:13000", false},
|
|
{"http localhost → not Secure", "http://localhost:3000", false},
|
|
{"empty → not Secure", "", false},
|
|
{"malformed → not Secure", "::not-a-url", false},
|
|
{"uppercase scheme still matches", "HTTPS://app.example.com", true},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Setenv("FRONTEND_ORIGIN", tc.frontendOrigin)
|
|
if got := isSecureCookie(); got != tc.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("isSecureCookie() = %v, want %v (FRONTEND_ORIGIN=%q)", got, tc.want, tc.frontendOrigin)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCookieDomain(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
env string
|
|
want string
|
|
}{
|
|
{"empty", "", ""},
|
|
{"whitespace only", " ", ""},
|
|
{"real domain", ".example.com", ".example.com"},
|
|
{"bare domain", "example.com", "example.com"},
|
|
{"IPv4 rejected", "192.168.5.5", ""},
|
|
{"IPv4 with leading dot rejected", ".192.168.5.5", ""},
|
|
{"IPv6 rejected", "::1", ""},
|
|
{"IPv6 bracketed is not a valid IP literal → passthrough", "[::1]", "[::1]"},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Setenv("COOKIE_DOMAIN", tc.env)
|
|
if got := cookieDomain(); got != tc.want {
|
|
t.Errorf("cookieDomain() = %q, want %q (COOKIE_DOMAIN=%q)", got, tc.want, tc.env)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSetAuthCookies_HTTPSelfHost covers the exact misconfiguration that
|
|
// shipped to users on LAN self-host: COOKIE_DOMAIN=<ip> + HTTP FRONTEND_ORIGIN.
|
|
// The cookie must land with no Domain attribute and Secure=false so browsers
|
|
// actually store it.
|
|
func TestSetAuthCookies_HTTPSelfHost(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Setenv("FRONTEND_ORIGIN", "http://192.168.5.5:13000")
|
|
t.Setenv("COOKIE_DOMAIN", "192.168.5.5")
|
|
|
|
rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
if err := SetAuthCookies(rec, "test-token"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("SetAuthCookies: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cookies := rec.Result().Cookies()
|
|
if len(cookies) != 2 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 2 cookies (auth + csrf), got %d", len(cookies))
|
|
}
|
|
for _, c := range cookies {
|
|
if c.Secure {
|
|
t.Errorf("cookie %q has Secure=true on HTTP origin; browser would reject it", c.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
if c.Domain != "" {
|
|
t.Errorf("cookie %q has Domain=%q; IP-address Domain would be rejected by the browser (RFC 6265)", c.Name, c.Domain)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestParseAuthTokenTTL(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
raw string
|
|
wantDur time.Duration
|
|
wantOK bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{"empty string", "", 0, false},
|
|
{"valid 3600", "3600", time.Hour, true},
|
|
{"valid 86400", "86400", 24 * time.Hour, true},
|
|
{"negative", "-100", 0, false},
|
|
{"zero", "0", 0, false},
|
|
{"non-numeric", "abc", 0, false},
|
|
{"whitespace trimmed", " 7200 ", 2 * time.Hour, true},
|
|
{"duration hours", "8760h", 8760 * time.Hour, true},
|
|
{"duration compound", "720h30m", 720*time.Hour + 30*time.Minute, true},
|
|
{"duration minutes", "90m", 90 * time.Minute, true},
|
|
{"duration negative", "-1h", 0, false},
|
|
{"duration zero", "0s", 0, false},
|
|
{"integer overflow", "9999999999", 0, false},
|
|
}
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
got, ok := parseAuthTokenTTL(tc.raw)
|
|
if ok != tc.wantOK || got != tc.wantDur {
|
|
t.Errorf("parseAuthTokenTTL(%q) = (%v, %v), want (%v, %v)", tc.raw, got, ok, tc.wantDur, tc.wantOK)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestSetAuthCookies_HTTPSProduction(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Setenv("FRONTEND_ORIGIN", "https://app.example.com")
|
|
t.Setenv("COOKIE_DOMAIN", "app.example.com")
|
|
|
|
rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
if err := SetAuthCookies(rec, "test-token"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("SetAuthCookies: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range rec.Result().Cookies() {
|
|
if !c.Secure {
|
|
t.Errorf("cookie %q missing Secure flag on HTTPS origin", c.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
if c.Domain != "app.example.com" {
|
|
t.Errorf("cookie %q Domain = %q, want %q", c.Name, c.Domain, "app.example.com")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// csrfHeaderFor builds the request a browser would send: the auth cookie the
|
|
// server set, plus the CSRF cookie's value echoed in the header.
|
|
// csrfRequest presents authToken as the auth cookie and echoes csrfValue in
|
|
// the single CSRF header. Which of the two cookie values a client puts there
|
|
// is the client's choice; the server tries both bindings either way.
|
|
func csrfRequest(t *testing.T, authToken, csrfValue string) *http.Request {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodPost, "/api/issues", nil)
|
|
req.AddCookie(&http.Cookie{Name: AuthCookieName, Value: authToken})
|
|
req.Header.Set(CSRFHeaderName, csrfValue)
|
|
return req
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// legacyCSRFRequest is the same request; the name records that the value came
|
|
// from the token-bound cookie — what a client that has not picked up the new
|
|
// cookie sends, and what a rolled-back server would be verifying.
|
|
func legacyCSRFRequest(t *testing.T, authToken, csrfValue string) *http.Request {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
return csrfRequest(t, authToken, csrfValue)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// cookieValues runs the real cookie-setting path and returns the readable
|
|
// cookies by name.
|
|
func cookieValues(t *testing.T, authToken string) map[string]string {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
rec := httptest.NewRecorder()
|
|
if err := SetAuthCookies(rec, authToken); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("SetAuthCookies: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
out := map[string]string{}
|
|
for _, c := range rec.Result().Cookies() {
|
|
out[c.Name] = c.Value
|
|
}
|
|
return out
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// setAuthCookiesFor runs the real cookie-setting path and returns the CSRF
|
|
// token it minted, so tests exercise the same code the login and renewal
|
|
// paths use rather than reimplementing the token format.
|
|
func setAuthCookiesFor(t *testing.T, authToken string) string {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
values := cookieValues(t, authToken)
|
|
if v := values[SessionCSRFCookieName]; v != "" {
|
|
return v
|
|
}
|
|
t.Fatal("no session-bound CSRF cookie was set")
|
|
return ""
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The point of binding CSRF to `sid` instead of to the token string: sliding
|
|
// renewal re-issues the auth cookie mid-session, and a CSRF token another tab
|
|
// read before that must keep working afterwards (MUL-7436).
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_SurvivesSessionRenewal(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, err := NewSessionID()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("NewSessionID: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
claims := sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), sid)
|
|
original := signSession(t, claims)
|
|
|
|
// A tab reads the CSRF cookie...
|
|
csrfToken := setAuthCookiesFor(t, original)
|
|
|
|
// ...the session is renewed on another tab's GET, producing a different
|
|
// auth token for the same session...
|
|
renewed, _, err := RenewSessionToken(claims)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("RenewSessionToken: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if renewed == original {
|
|
t.Fatal("renewal must produce a different token")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ...and the first tab's POST still validates against the new cookie.
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, renewed, csrfToken)) {
|
|
t.Error("CSRF token issued before renewal must stay valid after it")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The reverse also holds: a token minted after renewal works, so both
|
|
// tabs converge without either having to reload.
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, renewed, setAuthCookiesFor(t, renewed))) {
|
|
t.Error("CSRF token issued after renewal must validate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Binding to the session must not become a way to use one session's CSRF
|
|
// token against another's cookie.
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_RejectsTokenFromAnotherSession(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sidA, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
sidB, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
tokenA := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(time.Hour), sidA))
|
|
tokenB := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(time.Hour), sidB))
|
|
|
|
csrfA := setAuthCookiesFor(t, tokenA)
|
|
if ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, tokenB, csrfA)) {
|
|
t.Error("a CSRF token from another session must not validate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Everyone signed in when this ships holds a cookie pair minted under the old
|
|
// binding. Those must keep working until that session renews, or the deploy
|
|
// logs the whole userbase out of every state-changing action.
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_AcceptsTokenBinding(t *testing.T) {
|
|
legacy := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), ""))
|
|
|
|
values := cookieValues(t, legacy)
|
|
if values[SessionCSRFCookieName] != "" {
|
|
t.Error("a token without `sid` has no session to bind to; no session cookie should be set")
|
|
}
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(legacyCSRFRequest(t, legacy, values[CSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("a pre-MUL-7436 cookie pair must still validate")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// And the token binding stays bound: it is keyed by the token itself, so
|
|
// it must not validate against a different one.
|
|
other := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(time.Hour), ""))
|
|
if ValidateCSRF(legacyCSRFRequest(t, other, values[CSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("a token-bound CSRF value must not validate against a different auth token")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Rolling BACK past MUL-7436 must not strand signed-in users able to read and
|
|
// unable to write. A previous release verifies only the token binding, so
|
|
// every cookie set here has to include one — that is the sole reason it is
|
|
// still issued alongside the session binding.
|
|
func TestSetAuthCookies_KeepsTokenBindingForRollback(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
token := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), sid))
|
|
|
|
values := cookieValues(t, token)
|
|
if values[CSRFCookieName] == "" {
|
|
t.Fatal("the token-bound cookie must still be issued; without it a rollback cannot verify any write")
|
|
}
|
|
if values[SessionCSRFCookieName] == "" {
|
|
t.Fatal("the session-bound cookie must be issued")
|
|
}
|
|
if values[CSRFCookieName] == values[SessionCSRFCookieName] {
|
|
t.Error("the two cookies must carry different bindings")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Exactly what a rolled-back server does: verify the token-bound value
|
|
// against the auth cookie, knowing nothing about `sid`.
|
|
if !verifyCSRFToken(values[CSRFCookieName], func(nonce []byte) []byte {
|
|
return tokenCSRFSignature(token, nonce)
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Error("the token-bound cookie must verify under the pre-MUL-7436 scheme")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// And a current server accepts it too, so a client that only ever sends
|
|
// the token-bound header keeps working.
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(legacyCSRFRequest(t, token, values[CSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("a current server must still accept the token-bound header")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// After a renewal the token-bound cookie is re-minted for the NEW token, so a
|
|
// rollback taken at any point still finds a usable pair — that is what makes
|
|
// the rollback path complete rather than only true at login.
|
|
func TestSetAuthCookies_TokenBindingTracksRenewal(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
claims := sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), sid)
|
|
renewed, _, err := RenewSessionToken(claims)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("RenewSessionToken: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
values := cookieValues(t, renewed)
|
|
if !verifyCSRFToken(values[CSRFCookieName], func(nonce []byte) []byte {
|
|
return tokenCSRFSignature(renewed, nonce)
|
|
}) {
|
|
t.Error("the renewed token-bound cookie must be keyed to the renewed token")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// One header, two acceptable bindings: whichever cookie value a client
|
|
// chooses to echo, the server has to recognise it. This is what lets the
|
|
// single header name serve every client/server version combination without a
|
|
// CORS change — see CSRFHeaderName.
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_AcceptsEitherCookieValueInTheOneHeader(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
token := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), sid))
|
|
values := cookieValues(t, token)
|
|
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, token, values[SessionCSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("the session-bound value must validate")
|
|
}
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, token, values[CSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("the token-bound value must validate")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// After a renewal the token-bound value from BEFORE it is stale, and the
|
|
// session-bound one is not — which is the whole reason clients prefer it.
|
|
renewed, _, err := RenewSessionToken(sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(20*24*time.Hour), sid))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("RenewSessionToken: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, renewed, values[SessionCSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("a session-bound value must survive renewal")
|
|
}
|
|
if ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, renewed, values[CSRFCookieName])) {
|
|
t.Error("a pre-renewal token-bound value must NOT still validate; clients fall back to the re-minted one")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Expiry is not this gate's business. SessionIDFromToken reads `sid` without
|
|
// enforcing it, so an expired-but-genuine cookie still validates here and the
|
|
// auth middleware answers with the 401 that ends the session.
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_IgnoresExpirySoAuthCanAnswer(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
live := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(time.Hour), sid))
|
|
expired := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(-time.Hour), sid))
|
|
|
|
csrf := setAuthCookiesFor(t, live)
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, expired, csrf)) {
|
|
t.Error("an expired session must fail authentication, not CSRF — a 403 here never reaches the session-expiry path")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_RejectsMalformedAndMissing(t *testing.T) {
|
|
sid, _ := NewSessionID()
|
|
token := signSession(t, sessionClaims(t, time.Now().Add(time.Hour), sid))
|
|
|
|
cases := map[string]string{
|
|
"empty": "",
|
|
"no separator": "abcdef",
|
|
"bad nonce hex": "zz.00",
|
|
"bad sig hex": "00.zz",
|
|
"wrong sig": "0011223344556677889900112233445566.00",
|
|
"extra segments": "00.11.22",
|
|
}
|
|
for name, csrf := range cases {
|
|
t.Run(name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
if ValidateCSRF(csrfRequest(t, token, csrf)) {
|
|
t.Errorf("malformed CSRF token %q must not validate", csrf)
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// No auth cookie at all: nothing to bind to, so nothing validates.
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest(http.MethodPost, "/api/issues", nil)
|
|
req.Header.Set("X-CSRF-Token", setAuthCookiesFor(t, token))
|
|
if ValidateCSRF(req) {
|
|
t.Error("CSRF must not validate without an auth cookie")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestValidateCSRF_SafeMethodsSkipTheCheck(t *testing.T) {
|
|
for _, method := range []string{http.MethodGet, http.MethodHead, http.MethodOptions} {
|
|
req := httptest.NewRequest(method, "/api/issues", nil)
|
|
if !ValidateCSRF(req) {
|
|
t.Errorf("%s must not require a CSRF token", method)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|